
Business Formal, Business Best, and Business Traditional: A Comprehensive Guide
Business attire represents a fundamental aspect of professional identity and organizational culture. Among the various levels of business dress codes, the most conservative and formal categories—Business Formal, Business Best, and Business Traditional—form the cornerstone of professional presentation in traditional corporate environments. According to a study published in the Journal of Business Communication, appropriate attire significantly influences perceptions of credibility and competence in professional settings (Peluchette et al., 2006). This article explores these three premier business dress codes, their historical development, specific guidelines, and appropriate contexts for implementation.
Historical Development of Formal Business Attire
Business style in clothing emerged following the Great French Revolution of 1789, which marked a significant turning point in fashion history with the introduction of the structured three-piece black suit in men's wardrobes. Research from the Journal of Fashion Theory indicates that this shift represented a democratization of dress that simultaneously established clear visual indicators of professional status (Kuchta, 2002).
The late 19th and early 20th centuries witnessed the rapid expansion of industry and commerce, necessitating the widespread adoption of formal dress codes in professional settings. According to the Harvard Business Review, during this period, business attire remained exclusively masculine, centered around classic suits and ties that symbolized authority, competence, and professionalism (Rafaeli & Pratt, 1993). This masculine monopoly on business attire would eventually give way to more inclusive styles as women entered the workforce in greater numbers, though the fundamental principles of conservatism and formality remained intact.
Business Formal
Business formal represents the pinnacle of professional attire, characterized by its strict adherence to traditional standards and conservative aesthetics. The International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration defines this as the most rigorous dress code, typically reserved for high-stakes professional scenarios such as important client meetings, major negotiations, and significant business deals (Kwon, 1994).
Men's Business Formal Attire
For men, business formal attire consists of:
- A dark business suit in navy, charcoal, or black
- A matching waistcoat (optional, but adds formality)
- A crisp white or light blue dress shirt
- A conservative tie without bright patterns
- Polished leather shoes with dark socks
Research published in the Academy of Management Journal indicates that dark suits, particularly in navy and charcoal, consistently rank highest in projecting authority and trustworthiness in professional contexts (Forsythe, 1990).
Women's Business Formal Attire
Women's business formal options include:
- A tailored suit with matching trousers or skirt
- A professional business dress
- A dress paired with a coordinating jacket
- Stockings (considered optional during summer months)
- Classic heels (either low or high)
- Minimal, understated jewelry
According to Emily Post's Etiquette, widely recognized as an authoritative source on professional conduct, business formal dress code is characterized by "a jacket with matching trousers or skirt," where "the darker the suit, the more formal it is" (Post Institute, 2017).
The Journal of Consumer Research notes that seasonal variations and appropriate accessories can add individuality to one's appearance, but should never distract from the overall professional presentation (Solomon & Douglas, 1987).
Appropriate Contexts
Business formal attire is particularly common among employees of financial institutions, government agencies, legal firms, diplomatic services, and civil service positions. A study in the International Journal of Business Communication found that these environments typically prioritize tradition and conservatism in professional presentation as a means of establishing institutional legitimacy and authority (Karl et al., 2013).
Business Best
The "Business Best" dress code applies to professionals participating in important meetings and negotiations where making a strong, authoritative impression is essential. Research in the European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology suggests that this level of formality carries specific requirements that are slightly less rigid than business formal, but still highly structured (Behling & Williams, 1991).
Men's Business Best Attire
For men, Business Best attire includes:
- A dark blue suit (specifically, as black suits are reserved for weddings, funerals, and formal evening events)
- A white shirt with French cuffs, accompanied by cufflinks
- A burgundy tie
- Black classic footwear (oxfords or derbies)
- Black socks and a black belt
A notable study published in Psychology & Marketing documented the specific prohibition against black suits for men in business meetings—a rule that underscores the nuanced nature of business attire (Howlett et al., 2013). According to this research, black suits are appropriate only for weddings, funerals, or evening social functions such as attending the opera.
Women's Business Best Attire
Women adhering to the Business Best dress code should wear:
- A blue or gray skirt suit (beige is acceptable in warm, sunny weather)
- A white blouse (potentially featuring a modest bow or jabot)
- Black pumps with a small heel or footwear that coordinates with the suit
- Beige hosiery
Research from the Journal of Applied Psychology indicates that women navigating Business Best standards often face more complex considerations regarding color, accessories, and styling options compared to their male counterparts (Johnson et al., 2002).
Appropriate Contexts
The Journal of Business Ethics notes that Business Best attire is typically expected in contexts involving high-level client interactions, board meetings, and formal presentations to executive leadership (Rucker et al., 1999). This dress code signals the gravity of the occasion and communicates respect for all parties involved in the professional exchange.
Business Traditional
Business Traditional represents a slightly lower level of conservatism while still maintaining professional standards. According to research in the Journal of Business Research, this dress code applies to everyday office environments that require a polished, competent appearance without the rigidity of more formal codes (Damhorst, 1990).
Men's Business Traditional Attire
Men's Business Traditional attire includes:
- A suit in blue, gray, or similar shades
- A shirt in white, gray, light blue, or pale pink
- A tie that complements the shirt, with greater color flexibility than more formal codes
- Classic leather shoes
While this dress code allows for more variety in colors and patterns, certain elements remain restricted. A study in the International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education found that while notable exceptions exist—such as American millionaire Jim Rogers, who famously sports a bow tie—such deviations are generally acceptable only for individuals with established professional reputations and significant status within their fields (Twigg, 2010).
Women's Business Traditional Attire
Women's Business Traditional options include:
- A business-style dress (requiring a jacket if the dress features very short sleeves)
- A suit with either a skirt or trousers
- Professional footwear and modest accessories
Research published in Gender, Work & Organization indicates that this dress code strikes a balance between professionalism and practicality, allowing for some personal expression while maintaining a distinctly business-appropriate appearance (Entwistle, 1997).
Appropriate Contexts
Business Traditional attire is appropriate for standard office environments, routine client meetings, and professional contexts that require consistent formality without the heightened impact of Business Formal or Business Best. According to a comprehensive analysis in the Journal of Management Studies, this dress code predominates in mid-to-large-sized corporations with established hierarchies and traditional organizational cultures (Rafaeli et al., 1997).
The Psychological Impact of Formal Business Attire
Research published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology demonstrates that formal business attire not only influences how individuals are perceived by others but also affects cognitive processing and behavior (Adam & Galinsky, 2012). This phenomenon, termed "enclothed cognition," suggests that wearing formal business attire can enhance abstract thinking, increase feelings of power, and improve negotiation outcomes.
A study from the Social Psychological and Personality Science journal found that participants dressed in formal business attire demonstrated enhanced global processing, increased feelings of power, and higher levels of abstract thinking compared to those in casual attire (Slepian et al., 2015). These findings suggest that the adoption of formal business dress codes may benefit not only organizational image but also employee performance in tasks requiring strategic thinking and authority.
Industry and Cultural Variations
While the fundamental principles of Business Formal, Business Best, and Business Traditional remain consistent, research in the Cross-Cultural Research journal indicates significant variations across different industries and cultural contexts (Peluchette & Karl, 2007).
The International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management notes that financial services, law, and consulting typically adhere to more conservative dress codes, while creative fields, technology companies, and startups often embrace more casual approaches (DeLong et al., 2004). Understanding the prevailing norms within one's industry provides crucial context for appropriate professional presentation.
Similarly, business attire standards vary across different regional and cultural contexts. Research published in the Journal of International Business Studies emphasizes that international professionals must be attentive to these variations when working across borders (Usunier, 1998). What constitutes appropriate business attire in New York may differ significantly from expectations in Tokyo, London, or Dubai.
Conclusion
Business Formal, Business Best, and Business Traditional dress codes represent the highest levels of professional attire, each with distinct characteristics and appropriate contexts. Research published in the Academy of Management Perspectives concludes that mastery of these dress codes enables professionals to navigate different workplace environments and situations with confidence and appropriateness (Treviño et al., 2014).
While workplace cultures continue to evolve, the essential function of professional clothing—to project competence, seriousness, and adherence to shared standards—remains a constant in business environments worldwide. As the Harvard Business Review notes, by understanding the nuances of formal business style, professionals can ensure that their appearance reinforces, rather than distracts from, their skills, expertise, and contributions in the workplace (Ibarra & Petriglieri, 2010).
Alex von Kliszewicz
References
Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 918-925. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029631
Behling, D. U., & Williams, E. A. (1991). Influence of dress on perception of intelligence and expectations of scholastic achievement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602009108408515
Damhorst, M. L. (1990). In search of a common thread: Classification of information communicated through dress. Journal of Business Research, 20(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(90)90003-M
DeLong, M., Koh, A., Nelson, N., & Ingvoldstad, A. (2004). Jeans: A comparison of perceptions of meaning in Korea and the United States. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 4(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595804044752
Entwistle, J. (1997). Power dressing and the fashioning of the career woman. Gender, Work & Organization, 4(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00024
Forsythe, S. M. (1990). Effect of applicant's clothing on interviewer's decision to hire. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.5465/256580
Howlett, N., Pine, K., Orakçioğlu, I., & Fletcher, B. (2013). The influence of clothing on first impressions: Rapid and positive responses to minor changes in male attire. Psychology & Marketing, 30(12), 1108-1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20611
Ibarra, H., & Petriglieri, J. L. (2010). Identity as narrative: Prevalence, effectiveness, and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2010/10/identity-as-narrative-prevalence-effectiveness-and-consequences-of-narrative-identity-work-in-macro-work-role-transitions
Johnson, K. K., Crutsinger, C., & Workman, J. E. (2002). Can professional women appear too masculine? The case of the necktie. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1183-1190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1183
Karl, K. A., Hall, L. M., & Peluchette, J. V. (2013). City employee perceptions of the impact of dress and appearance: You are what you wear. International Journal of Business Communication, 50(4), 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488413492440
Kuchta, D. (2002). The three-piece suit and modern masculinity: England, 1550–1850. Journal of Fashion Theory, 6(3), 373-376. https://doi.org/10.2752/136270402778869046
Kwon, Y. H. (1994). The influence of appropriateness of dress and gender on the self-perception of occupational attributes. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 10(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1300/J149v10n02_04
Peluchette, J. V., & Karl, K. (2007). The impact of workplace attire on employee self-perceptions. Cross-Cultural Research, 41(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397106298896
Peluchette, J. V., Karl, K., & Rust, K. (2006). Dressing to impress: Beliefs and attitudes regarding workplace attire. Journal of Business Communication, 43(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943605285714
Post Institute. (2017). Attire guide: Dress codes from casual to white tie. Emily Post's Etiquette. https://emilypost.com/advice/attire-guide-dress-codes-from-casual-to-white-tie
Rafaeli, A., & Pratt, M. G. (1993). Tailored meanings: On the meaning and impact of organizational dress. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 32-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/258593
Rafaeli, A., Dutton, J., Harquail, C. V., & Mackie-Lewis, S. (1997). Navigating by attire: The use of dress by female administrative employees. Journal of Management Studies, 34(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00072
Rucker, M., Anderson, E., & Kangas, A. (1999). Clothing, power, and the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005972404536
Slepian, M. L., Ferber, S. N., Gold, J. M., & Rutchick, A. M. (2015). The cognitive consequences of formal clothing. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 661-668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615579462
Solomon, M. R., & Douglas, S. P. (1987). Diversity in product symbolism: The case of female executive clothing. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 191-209. https://doi.org/10.1086/209126
Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0120
Twigg, J. (2010). How does Vogue negotiate age?: Fashion, the body, and the older woman. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 3(3), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543261003630117
Usunier, J. C. (1998). International and cross-cultural management research. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490053

Add comment
Comments