The Cultural and Historical Significance of Neckties

Abstract

This article examines the historical evolution, cultural significance, and semiotic function of the necktie as a sartorial element across different contexts. Originating in the 17th century and evolving into a complex signifier of social identity, professional affiliation, and aesthetic sensibility, the necktie represents a compelling case study in the semiotics of fashion and professional attire. This analysis explores how this seemingly simple accessory functions as a powerful communicative tool across various cultural and professional domains.

Historical Origins

The necktie, commonly referred to as a cravat in European linguistic traditions, derives etymologically from the French term "cravate" (Cumming, 2010). This terminology subsequently proliferated throughout numerous European languages, including German ("Krawatte"), Spanish ("corbata"), and Polish ("krawat"). Etymological evidence suggests that the French designation "cravate" likely evolved from "Croat," reflecting the accessory's origin among Croatian military personnel (Chenoune, 1993).

The historical record indicates that Croatian cavalry officers serving in Austrian regiments during the Thirty Years' War (1618-1648) wore distinctive silk scarves as part of their military attire. When these officers were received at the court of Queen Anne of Austria as recognition for their military valor, their distinctive neckwear attracted the attention of King Louis XIV, who subsequently adopted the style himself (Hart & North, 2009). This royal appropriation catalyzed the widespread adoption of the cravat throughout the French court and, by extension, throughout European fashion circles.

Cultural Diffusion and Codification

The necktie's cultural significance was further consolidated in 1827 when Honoré de Balzac published "L'Art de Mettre sa Cravate" ("The Art of Wearing a Necktie"), effectively elevating the practice to a formalized aesthetic discipline (Balzac, 1827/2003). This publication represented an early instance of codifying necktie protocols, establishing a tradition of sartorial regulation that persists in contemporary dress codes.

Contemporary Protocols and Conventions

The contemporary necktie is governed by specific conventions regarding its selection, configuration, and maintenance. Chromatic and pattern selection should demonstrate congruence with complementary garments and situational appropriateness. For quotidian contexts, subdued hues featuring minimal repetitive patterns are prescribed, typically paired with lighter-colored shirts (Roetzel, 2009).

Specific positioning protocols stipulate that the terminal point of the tied necktie should approximate 2.5 centimeters below the trouser belt buckle. Violations of this positioning standard, such as excessive length remediated by belt insertion, constitute significant contraventions of established dress codes (Flusser, 2002).

Current necktie etiquette encompasses three primary prohibitions:

1. The display of loosened neckties, interpreted as demonstrating disrespect for social contexts
2. The concealment of the narrow terminus within shirt confines
3. The insertion of necktie extremities into trousers

Appropriate storage methodology requires maintenance in an untied configuration, preferably suspended on a specialized hanger bar for silk compositions or in a rolled configuration for wool variants (Antongiavanni, 2006).

Accessory Apparatus

Several specialized accessories have been developed to complement necktie function and appearance:

1. Tie bars/clips (introduced circa 1920s): Devices that secure the necktie to the shirt front
2. Collar pins: Fastening implements that affix collar extremities beneath the necktie
3. Collar bars: Non-perforating alternatives to collar pins
4. Tie pins/tacks: Originally functional fasteners now primarily serving decorative functions
5. Tie chains: Hybrid securing mechanisms incorporating button attachment and chain elements

Institutional Signification

The necktie's capacity to signify institutional affiliation represents a relatively recent development, emerging primarily in late 19th century England (Gibbings, 1990). Within British educational institutions and Commonwealth countries, neckties frequently constitute mandatory uniform components, worn either continuously or for specific seasonal or ceremonial occasions. In educational contexts, neckties may additionally denote residential affiliation or leadership status.

Ties as a Sign of Membership

The use of coloured and patterned neckties indicating the wearer's membership in a club, military regiment, school, professional association or other institution, dates only from late-19th century England.

In the United Kingdom and many Commonwealth countries, neckties are commonly an essential component of a school uniform and are either worn daily, seasonally or on special occasions with the school blazer. In Hong Kong, Australia and New Zealand, neckties are worn as the everyday uniform, usually as part of the winter uniform. In countries with no winter such as Sri Lanka, Singapore, Malaysia, and many African countries, the necktie is usually worn as part of the formal uniform on special occasions or functions. Neckties may also denote membership in a house or a leadership role (i.e. school prefect, house captain, etc.).

The predominant pattern for institutional identification in the United Kingdom and continental Europe consists of diagonal striping in alternating colors, oriented diagonally from the wearer's left side. The specific color combinations often carry significant institutional symbolism. For instance, the Household Division's regimental tie, featuring dark blue and red elements, is purported to represent the "blue blood" of the royal lineage juxtaposed with the "red blood" of the Guards (Chesterfield, 2008).

In the United States, diagonally striped ties are commonly worn with no connotation of a group membership. Typically, American striped ties have the stripes running downward from the wearer's right (the opposite of the European style). (However, when Americans wear striped ties as a sign of membership, the European stripe style may be used.) In some cases, American "repp stripe" ties may simply be reverse images of British regimental ties. Striped ties are strongly associated with the Ivy League and preppy style of dress.

So ties in many educational institutions serve as an identification mark for pupils and students. By which it is immediately clear where you are receiving or have received an education. Such a tie is kept for life, and often it serves as a pass to where another person would not be allowed. Graduates of Eton, Cambridge or Oxford always support each other - such is the tradition. College ties allow their owners to communicate their affiliation in such a simple way.

Including being used by members of clubs such as yacht clubs, golf clubs or others.

An alternative membership tie pattern to diagonal stripes is either a single emblem or a crest centered and placed where a tie pin normally would be, or a repeated pattern of such motifs. Sometimes, both types are used by an organization, either simply to offer a choice or to indicate a distinction among levels of membership. Occasionally, a hybrid design is used, in which alternating stripes of color are overlaid with repeated motif patterns.

Gender Dimensions

While historically associated with masculine attire, neckties have increasingly been incorporated into female professional uniforms across various sectors, including hospitality, law enforcement, and educational institutions. Additionally, contemporary fashion has appropriated the necktie as a feminine style element, divorced from its traditional gender associations (Crane, 2000).

Professional Contexts

Traditionally, the necktie has functioned as an essential component of professional business attire, particularly within formally structured organizational environments. Outside explicitly professional contexts, neckties typically signify participation in formal or ceremonial occasions.

Contemporary Challenges and Persistence

The late 20th century witnessed significant challenges to necktie hegemony, particularly within technology-oriented corporate cultures. Organizations including Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google pioneered relaxed dress codes that diminished or eliminated necktie requirements. The institutionalization of "Casual Friday" practices further eroded necktie ubiquity, while some organizations (notably IKEA) have explicitly prohibited necktie wearing (Kiddie, 2009).

Despite these challenges, the necktie retains significant cultural capital as a marker of formality and professionalism, particularly within conservative professional domains such as law and finance. The accessory continues to function as a visual signifier of authority and institutional power, regularly observed among political figures and corporate leadership (Joseph, 1986).

Color Symbolism and Communication

Contemporary color psychology research has identified specific communicative functions associated with necktie chromatic selection:

• Red: Connotes dominance, confidence, and assertiveness; appropriate for negotiations and public speaking contexts
• Blue: Signifies trustworthiness and professionalism; suitable for interviews and collaborative environments
• Black: Communicates formality and classic elegance; reserved for ceremonial contexts
• Green: Suggests balance and openness; appropriate for informal and creative settings
• Yellow: Indicates optimism and innovative thinking; suitable for creative contexts
• Gray: Projects neutrality and reliability; appropriate for conventional business environments
• Purple: Suggests distinction and creative ambition; suitable for formal and artistic contexts
• White: Communicates purity and traditionalism; appropriate for formal ceremonial occasions

Conclusion

The necktie represents a complex semiotic system that has evolved significantly beyond its initial functional purpose. As a multivalent signifier, it communicates information regarding institutional affiliation, professional identity, aesthetic sensibility, and situational awareness. Despite contemporary challenges to its prominence, the necktie continues to function as a significant communicative element within professional and formal social contexts, demonstrating remarkable persistence as a cultural symbol.

Alex von Kliszewicz

References

Antongiavanni, N. (2006). The suit: A machiavellian approach to men's style. HarperCollins.

Balzac, H. (2003). The art of tying the cravat. (H. Le Blanc, Trans.). University of Pennsylvania Press. (Original work published 1827)

Chenoune, F. (1993). A history of men's fashion. Flammarion.

Chesterfield, P. (2008). The complete guide to British regimental ties. Martin Books.

Crane, D. (2000). Fashion and its social agendas: Class, gender, and identity in clothing. University of Chicago Press.

Cumming, V. (2010). The dictionary of fashion history. Berg Publishers.

Flusser, A. (2002). Dressing the man: Mastering the art of permanent fashion. HarperCollins.

Gibbings, S. (1990). The tie: Trends and traditions. Studio Editions.

Hart, A., & North, S. (2009). Historical fashion in detail: The 17th and 18th centuries. V&A Publications.

Joseph, N. (1986). Uniforms and nonuniforms: Communication through clothing. Greenwood Press.

Kiddie, T. (2009). Recent trends in business casual attire and their effects on student job seekers. Business Communication Quarterly, 72(3), 350-354.

Roetzel, B. (2009). Gentleman: A timeless guide to fashion. h.f.ullmann.